Reject actually blocks
You defend these cases. Don't get named in one.
The wiretapping suits hitting California-accessible sites turn on one thing: a tracking pixel that kept firing after a visitor declined. ConsentStack gates those third-party tags client-side, so on a decline the request never leaves the browser and the consent log records exactly what was honored. The best available defensible posture, not a promise of immunity.
The request never fires
When a visitor declines, the call to Meta, LinkedIn, or Google never leaves their browser. It is blocked, not quietly recorded as a preference and hoped honored downstream.
A defensible record
Every decision is logged with timestamp, jurisdiction, and the banner version active at the time. The evidence a firm wants on hand the day a demand letter arrives.
Provable in the network tab
Decline, open devtools, and the tracking calls simply are not there. The kind of proof your own litigators, or a client's, can run for themselves.
Vendor diligence, documented
Reasonable efforts, on the record.
Your confidentiality obligations expect diligence on the vendors handling client data, yet the marketing site's tags usually run on autopilot, owned by an agency and never reviewed. ConsentStack scans every third-party request, classifies it, and produces an exportable inventory. It is the documentation layer your diligence rests on, not a substitute for the review itself.
Every tag, surfaced
The scanner catches what loads on your site, including the tags an outside agency added during a rebuild and nobody wrote down. No more guessing what is firing on your pages.
Classified and owned
Each request is sorted by purpose and matched to a known vendor, so the inventory reads like a register a reviewer can work through, not a wall of raw network calls.
Export on request
When the diligence file, an examiner, or a client questionnaire asks, export the inventory and the consent records as CSV or JSON and hand them over. The answer is already prepared.
A banner worthy of the brand
Client trust is the product. The banner should show it.
A clunky banner that covers your partner bios reads as a firm that is careless with technology, which is the opposite of what a prospective client needs to feel. Your consent surface inherits your typeface, color, and spacing, so it looks like the firm built it on purpose. Removable Powered by branding.
Wears your brand
Color tokens, layouts, and custom CSS match the banner to the site your designer shipped. Visitors see the firm's aesthetic, not a vendor watermark slapped on top.
Live in an afternoon
One script tag and the banner is up, no procurement theater and no enterprise rollout. The marketing lead can stand it up without opening a ticket with IT.
Edit without a rebuild
Copy, colors, and layout change from the dashboard, so refreshing the banner alongside a site update does not mean a call back to the web agency.
Built for how your firm works
Every kind of practice, every jurisdiction.
A firm with M&A clients in the EU and prospects in California answers to several rulebooks at once. ConsentStack resolves the right experience by visitor location, covering every US state, GDPR, and more from one dashboard across your marketing site and microsites.
Law firms
The fact that a client is inquiring is itself sensitive. Gate the intake-page pixels that would leak it, and keep a defensible record of the vendor diligence your confidentiality duties expect.
Accounting firms
AICPA standards turn on specific client consent before disclosure. Hold the tags on your contact and intake forms until a visitor agrees, and log the decision either way.
Consultancies
Your thought-leadership marketing pulls EU and global traffic, and your engagements run on confidentiality. Regional rules keep the site clean without gutting your attribution.
Registered advisers
SEC Reg S-P expects vendor oversight by June 3, 2026. ConsentStack covers the marketing-site slice with an inventory and logs your compliance lead can show, not the whole program.
“Most CMPs don't actually stop data from leaving your site, they record preferences.”
Freshpaint, Consent Management Platforms: The RealityCompetitor blog, cited as field admission.
Common questions
Yes. ConsentStack is built for mid-market professional services firms that run a marketing site without a dedicated privacy team. It covers GDPR, CCPA, every US state law, and 70+ other regulations from a single script tag. Pricing starts at $29/mo with no per-domain lock-in and no enterprise sales process, so a marketing lead can stand it up in an afternoon. Law firms, CPA practices, consultancies, and registered investment advisers all fit the same shape.
Yes. ConsentStack gates third-party tags client-side, so when a visitor declines, the request to Meta Pixel, LinkedIn, Google Ads, and the rest never leaves the browser. It is blocked, not recorded as a preference and hoped honored downstream. You can confirm it in your browser's network tab. This is client-side gating; server-to-server calls from your own backend are outside what any consent banner controls.
It supports them; it does not satisfy them on its own. The scanner inventories every third-party tag on your site and the consent log records each decision, which is the documentation layer your confidentiality and vendor-oversight duties rest on. ABA Rule 1.6, AICPA standards, and SEC Reg S-P remain obligations the firm owns, and a CMP is one slice of the marketing-site surface, not the whole program. ConsentStack is deliberately clear about where that line sits.
No. ConsentStack signals consent state to Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other major platforms using the signaling each one requires, so attribution keeps working and the banner blocks only what compliance requires. The banner itself inherits your color, type, and layout, with removable Powered by branding, so it reads as part of the firm's site rather than a vendor add-on.
ConsentStack is built for firms that want third-party tags to actually stop on a decline, broader regulatory coverage, transparent pricing, and a banner they can install in an afternoon. OneTrust fits enterprise procurement-led buyers with a privacy program already in place; Termly is a low-end DIY option many firms inherit from a site rebuild. For a mid-market firm without a dedicated privacy team, ConsentStack is the cleaner fit. See ConsentStack vs OneTrust and ConsentStack vs Termly for details.
100+ happy customers
Cover your own site before someone else does.
Gate the pixels that get firms named, prove it with audit logs, and give clients a banner that looks like you know what you are doing.